Today we released a new CDL report: “Legal Entanglements: Mapping Connections of Anti-Offshore Wind Groups and their Lawyers in the Eastern United States,” a deep look into litigation efforts against offshore wind in the Northeast.
The production of wind energy is crucial for meeting science-based climate goals, particularly in the New England region. But in addition to the looming risk of the federal government withdrawing funds, this endeavor towards non-reliance on fossil fuels is being continually threatened by private lawsuits. To better understand the legal challenges facing offshore wind, students at Brown University’s Climate and Development Lab compiled lawsuits and legal comments submitted to federal agencies about Northeast wind projects between January 2020 and May 2025. The research shows legal networks driving this opposition—revealing a coordinated effort to delay offshore wind projects and undermine public support.
Five major networks emerged, including private law firms and organizations with a track record of anti-environmental litigation and lobbying, and deep ties to fossil fuel interests. Though many of these lawsuits have been dismissed, they succeed in creating costly delays, and casting doubt for the public and policy-makers.
With new federal rollbacks on the horizon, understanding this legal resistance is more important than ever for this infant industry, and for climate action. The full report, along with the Lab’s peer-reviewed article ‘ Beyond Dark Money ’ and policy briefing ‘ Against the Wind ,’ offers a detailed look into how offshore wind opposition is being organized—and why it matters for the future of U.S. climate policy and meeting climate goals. See the full report, “Legal Entanglements: Mapping Connections of Anti-Offshore Wind Groups and their Lawyers in the Eastern United States” below.
Disclaimer: This report represents an initial phase of research about the role of lawyers in the networks of opposition to offshore wind development, produced by a team of undergraduate students in Brown University’s Climate and Development Lab. The statements, views, opinions, and information contained in the report are personal to the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of Brown University