Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Google’s Pixel 10 has plenty going for it — but top-tier performance remains as elusive as ever. It’s been this way for years, but rather than closing, the gap appears to have grown between the latest Tensor G5 and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. With smartphones now defined by AI workloads and gaming prowess, the ballooning divide between Google’s Tensor and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon has never been more telling.
Recent Geekbench 6 and 3DMark benchmark results don’t paint Google’s latest processor in the best light. Qualcomm’s finest appears to be significantly faster, with over twice the multi-core CPU performance potential and graphics capabilities that are around 2.5x faster than Google’s.
On the one hand, this performance gap might not make much difference to browsing the web, swiping through social streams, or other applications that already run silky smooth. However, such a chasm in gaming performance with the impending bridging of phones and laptops is hard to ignore.
But why does Snapdragon come out so far ahead of Google’s Tensor project? To find out, we need to peel back the lid and see what makes these chips work.
Don’t want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a favorite source in Google Discover to never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more.
to never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. You can also set us as a preferred source in Google Search by clicking the button below.
It’s an Arm wrestle
The central processing unit (CPU) is the main “brain” of your phone’s chipset, and recent developments have given Qualcomm’s Snapdragon a major boost. Qualcomm now designs its CPU cores in-house, under the Oryon branding, allowing it to accelerate its design in scale and size compared to Arm’s ready-made CPU blueprints — known as IP — that most chipmakers license rather than design themselves.
While all smartphone chips are based on Arm’s architecture, each CPU core’s building blocks and capabilities differ, with their own power, performance efficiency, and size trade-offs. This is at the heart of the discrepancy between Tensor and Snapdragon — and Qualcomm has chosen to take its CPU design in a slightly different direction from what its rivals buy in.
... continue reading