Last month, AI company Anthropic agreed to a blockbuster $1.5 billion settlement after being caught red-handed training its models on an enormous cache of pirated versions of copyrighted books and other material.
Now, a similar lawsuit aimed at ChatGPT maker OpenAI has taken a dramatic turn, raising the possibility of yet another major legal escalation regarding AI-facilitated copyright infringement — and a potentially much bigger payout to rightsholders.
Specifically, authors and publishers who filed a lawsuit against the Sam Altman-led firm have secured access to internal Slack messages and emails discussing the mass deletion of a pirated books dataset, Bloomberg reports. A New York district court ordered OpenAI to hand over the communications regarding data deletion last week.
According to the publication, the communications could demonstrate willful infringement, potentially leading to enhanced damages of up to $150,000 per work, a massive increase from just $750.
For context: Anthropic’s settlement only covered around half a million works out of an estimated seven million, resulting in a payout of around $3,000 per author. Authors and publishers had just gone after similar communications — right before the case settled.
“Finding out what attorneys said or what clients said to attorneys and back and forth probably gives us a lot of evidence regarding state of mind,” Hamline University professor David Schultz told Bloomberg.
The lawsuit highlights the AI industry’s largely careless treatment of copyrighted materials. Tech leaders have continued to argue that training AI models on protected content falls under “fair use,” a legal doctrine that allows for transformative use of copyrighted materials.
Most recently, OpenAI’s TikTok-like text-to-video app Sora 2 has been found to spit out a litany of videos heavily based on protected intellectual property, showing it’s not just ChatGPT potentially infringing copyright. (Sloppily-implemented guardrails have since stemmed the tide somewhat, but users are easily finding ways around them.)
Given the major payouts at stake, the tides could be turning in favor of artists who had their lifework sucked up by AI models without permission, who could be looking at another consolation prize in the form of a settlement fee.
Both Anthropic and OpenAI have been accused of training their AI models on copyrighted materials uploaded to a piracy website called LibGen.
... continue reading