Key Takeaways Most AI pilots fail: 95% of enterprise AI pilots show no return on investment due to poor workflow fit, a lack of AI model learning, and weak workflow integration.
95% of enterprise AI pilots show no return on investment due to poor workflow fit, a lack of AI model learning, and weak workflow integration. Workers prefer consumer LLMs: Employees prefer consumer LLM tools like ChatGPT over enterprise AI solutions because of familiar interfaces and better outputs.
Employees prefer consumer LLM tools like ChatGPT over enterprise AI solutions because of familiar interfaces and better outputs. Success comes from adaptive AI systems: Companies that embed AI into workflows, enable feedback learning for AI, and scale from small but high-value use cases achieve success in their AI pilots.
Despite billions of dollars invested in AI adoption, most companies have little to show for it.
According to the latest MIT NANDA research, 95% of organizations that started GenAI pilots saw no return on investment.
While the vast majority of AI pilots are failing badly, with no measurable profit and loss (P&L) impact, only 5% of integrated AI pilots are generating millions in business value.
Why Are GenAI Pilots Failing?
Most pilots fail not because of weak models, but because the tools don’t match real workflows.
Employees expect AI to adapt, learn, and improve, but most enterprise systems fail to meet these expectations.
So why do most companies struggle while only a few succeed? The research points to three main reasons.
... continue reading