AUTHOR: Topher Lyons, Solutions Engineer at Sprocket Security
The Limits of Passive Internet-Scan Data
Most organizations are familiar with the traditional approach to external visibility: rely on passive internet-scan data, subscription-based datasets, or occasional point-in-time reconnaissance to understand what they have facing the public internet. These sources are typically delivered as static snapshots of lists of assets, open ports, or exposures observed during a periodic scan cycle.
While useful for broad trend awareness, passive datasets are often misunderstood. Many security teams assume they provide a complete picture of everything attackers can see. But in today’s highly dynamic infrastructure, passive data ages quickly.
Cloud footprints shift by the day, development teams deploy new services continuously, and misconfigurations appear (and disappear) far faster than passive scans can keep up.
As a result, organizations relying solely on passive data often make decisions based on stale or incomplete information.
To maintain an accurate, defensive view of the external attack surface, teams need something different: continuous, automated, active reconnaissance that verifies what’s actually exposed every day.
Today’s Attack Surface: Fast-Moving, Fragmented, and Hard to Track
Attack surfaces used to be relatively static. A perimeter firewall, a few public-facing servers, and a DNS zone or two made discovery manageable. But modern infrastructure has changed everything.
Cloud adoption has decentralized hosting, pushing assets across multiple providers and regions.
... continue reading