macOS Tahoe app icons came under fire late last year with commenters describing them as “terrible” and “objectively bad.” In our poll, 9to5Mac readers had exceedingly mixed views.
Software engineer Nikita Prokopov has now drawn attention to the icons used within menus and pointed out that they almost exactly mirror the approach which Apple’s Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines advised against back in 1992 …
Prokopov shared a graphic from the guidelines which showed what Apple described as an “ugly” menu, with each item having its own icon, contrasted with what the company considered good practice, which was very few in-menu icons.
He then points to Apple breaking this guideline with Tahoe menus.
Admittedly, resolutions have improved dramatically since those days, and it could be argued that in-menu icons today are much clearer, but Prokopov argues against that too.
The main function of an icon is to help you find what you are looking for faster. Perhaps counter-intuitively, adding an icon to everything is exactly the wrong thing to do. To stand out, things need to be different. But if everything has an icon, nothing stands out.
He suggests the approach Microsoft took in the early days, with icons restricted to only the most commonly used functions, is a better one.
But it gets worse. He also points out that Apple uses inconsistent icons for the exact same function in different apps – Including things as basic as New. Depending on the app, Apple uses five markedly different icons to essentially mean the same thing.
As if that weren’t bad enough, he also points to examples where Apple uses the exact same icon to mean completely different things! For example, the icon for a new note in the Notes app is the same one as the “edit address” icon in the Contacts app.
His blog post is illustrated with a great many examples, as well as suggested improvements using fewer icons and colour coding them. It’s definitely worth checking out.
... continue reading