Biofuels, such as rapeseed, are not an ideal alternative to non-fossil carbon.Credit: Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg/Getty
There’s a relatively new word doing the rounds in sustainability research and policy: defossilization. Beyond expert circles, it isn’t necessarily obvious that phasing out fossil fuels does not mean phasing out carbon. Under net-zero scenarios, carbon-based fuels are still needed, to provide power, for example, and for aviation. Carbon, currently often derived from fossil hydrocarbons, is also integral to everyday consumer products such as soaps and detergents, as well as medicines, fertilizers and plastics.
Worldwide, demand for ‘embedded’ carbon — that found in chemicals — is expected to double by 2050, according to the nova-Institute, a green-energy research institute in Hürth, Germany (see go.nature.com/4jpx6qi). But this carbon cannot come from the usual sources, such as coal, natural gas and oil. These must remain in the ground, and this is where defossilization comes in.
Chemistry can make plastics sustainable – but isn’t the whole solution
Defossilization means finding sustainable ways to make carbon-based chemicals. Alternative sources of carbon include the atmosphere and plants, as well as carbon in existing biological or industrial waste, such as used plastics or agricultural residue. In some cases, these chemicals will eventually return carbon dioxide to the atmosphere through burning or biodegradation. In principle, this will occur as part of a circular process, rather than one that has added greenhouse gases.
The subject of defossilization is of increasing research interest — as it needs to be — despite signs that some governments, including a number in Europe and that of the United States, are backsliding on their climate commitments. In this two-part Editorial, we describe some of the challenges faced by researchers, in both academia and industry, that scientists and policymakers need to solve to enable defossilization to happen on the scale required. In this first instalment, we focus on Europe. In the next, we explore advances under way in China.
Biomass from crops is a key source of non-fossil carbon, and one that can be obtained at scale. One driver of large-scale production is the European Union’s biofuels strategy. This mandates that transport fuels include biomass-derived products. Examples include biodiesel, which can be made from oils such as sunflower and palm, and bioethanol, which is synthesized from crops such as maize (corn) and wheat. But clearing existing cropland or converting uncultivated land to grow biofuels can’t be the alternative of choice, not least because of the attendant risk to biodiversity and soil health, and the demand it puts on water resources. There’s also some evidence that, by encouraging farmers to convert land previously used to grow food crops, the directive has pushed up food prices.
Reinvent oil refineries for a net-zero future
The extraction of carbon from lignocellulose — tough plant matter — in crop waste is an alternative with potential that remains mostly untapped. One major advantage is the fact that it can be produced without the use of extra land. But it is expensive to extract, and production timelines are long, both of which hinder scalability1.
Other potential sources of waste carbon include municipal and industrial waste, with used plastic among this. More than 40% of plastic produced in the EU is already recycled. This recycling rate could be increased if technical challenges can be surmounted2. Current recycling methods break waste plastics into flakes through shredding or melting, then form pellets that can be used to make new products. For higher recycling rates to be achieved, chemical recycling methods will need to be further developed and scaled up. These methods break down plastics into smaller molecules that can be used to rebuild new, larger ones.
... continue reading