SpaceX CEO and unelected White House advisor Elon Musk unexpectedly said today that he wants the International Space Station destroyed "as soon as possible."
In a tweet today, the mercurial entrepreneur asserted that it's "time to begin preparations for deorbiting the space station," arguing that "it has served its purpose," with "very little incremental utility."
Instead, Musk argued, the station should be destroyed within two years — but left the final decision "up to the President."
It's a confounding statement that comes at an extremely inopportune time. We can only guess as to why Musk wants to ditch existing plans to retire the orbital lab in 2030 — with the help of his space company, we should note. But exerting pressure to ditch the ISS could quickly turn into a massive headache for billionaire tech founder and SpaceX space tourist Jared Isaacman, who's in Washington, DC, for his confirmation (a date has yet to be set).
But as Ars Technica's Eric Berger reports, the space station has key advocates in Congress, including senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), who has historically supported the station's continued operation.
A source with knowledge of the matter told Berger that Cruz was "furious" with Musk over the tweet. The Congressman will oversee Isaacman's confirmation process as the chairman of the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Those meetings could be thrown into chaos with Musk, who now wields a huge amount of influence in the White House, advocating for the early retirement of the station.
Going forward, Isaacman will have to walk a tightrope: appeasing an unpredictable and hugely influential Musk while maintaining good relations on Capitol Hill.
Why would Musk dump existing plans to retire the space station? In his tweet, Musk renewed his call to "go to Mars," suggesting the mercurial CEO was looking to shore up the funds to send spacecraft, and eventually humans, to the Red Planet.
NASA spends roughly $4.1 billion on the space station per year out of its $25.4 billion annual budget. Almost half of that goes to Musk's SpaceX as part of its transportation budget to deliver astronauts to and from the station using the company's Dragon spacecraft.
Chances are that getting astronauts to the surface of Mars would cost orders of magnitude more than that, as experts have previously suggested — if it's even possible at all, that is.
... continue reading