A “click to cancel” law was last month passed in California, and now the FTC has ratified a federal rule designed to achieve the same goal. The idea of both is to force companies to make it as easy to cancel an online or app subscription as it is to sign up in the first place. Update: Following a court challenge, the US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the rule. See update at the end … Both laws were introduced in response to sketchy practices by companies designed to make it as difficult as possible to unsubscribe. The proposed rule would require businesses to make it at least as easy to cancel a subscription as it was to start it. For example, if you can sign up online, you must be able to cancel on the same website, in the same number of steps. The FTC launched an investigation into Adobe after customers accused the company of shady practices in this area. Federal ‘click to cancel subscriptions’ rule is ratified The agency has now announced that the rule has been finalized. “Too often, businesses make people jump through endless hoops just to cancel a subscription,” said Commission Chair Lina M. Khan. “The FTC’s rule will end these tricks and traps, saving Americans time and money. Nobody should be stuck paying for a service they no longer want.” It’s common for subscriptions to automatically renew unless cancelled, which the FTC refers to as “a negative option” – that is, the subscription is opt out rather than opt in annually. The new rule imposes four conditions on all subscriptions: Clearly and accurately disclose all material facts Clearly disclose the fact that the subscription will continue until cancelled Get “express informed consent” to automatic renewal Make it as easy to cancel the subscription as it was to sign up But it has been weakened in two ways When originally drafted, the rule would have required companies to send annual reminders that your subscription is still active. This was intended to address the common scenario of consumers forgetting about an unused subscription. Engadget notes that requirement has now been removed. Second, companies were to be banned from trying to persuade you to keep your subscription by listing benefits or making reduced payment offers. The thinking here is that this contradicts the idea of a one-click unsubscribe process. This too has been removed from the final version of the rule, so companies can still make arguments and offers intended to persuade you to change your mind. Provided there’s no legal challenge, the rule will take effect in six months. Engadget reports that enforcement has been delayed by two months, and the law may be weakened. While the rule was nevertheless set to be implemented on May 14, the FTC now says enforcement has been pushed back 60 days to July 14 […] The statement adds, “if that enforcement experience exposes problems with the Rule, the Commission is open to amending” it. A number of companies and trade bodies opposed the rule (act surprised), and have sadly succeeded in getting it overturned in court. The court ruled that procedural errors made it unenforceable, and that the only practical response was to vacate it entirely. While we certainly do not endorse the use of unfair and deceptive practices in negative option marketing, the procedural deficiencies of the Commission’s rulemaking process are fatal here […] Accordingly, we grant the petitions for review and vacate the Rule. While it could in theory be rewritten and reintroduced, that seems unlikely in the current political climate. Highlighted accessories Image: Nick Youngson/alphastockimages.com | CC3.0