Why Lua Beats MicroPython for Serious Embedded Devs
In professional embedded projects, ranging from industrial automation to medical devices and commercial IoT products, developers increasingly favor high-level, lightweight, and easy-to-use environments. While MicroPython has earned praise for rapid prototyping and field deployments on microcontrollers, its active ecosystem is largely centered around hobbyist boards.
It is important to note that Python’s greatest strength, its vast library ecosystem with tools like NumPy and pandas, is not available in MicroPython. By necessity, the standard library is intentionally pared down, and heavy data science modules aren’t included. It is also far less common to see C extensions embedded directly in MicroPython compared to Lua, which was built from the ground up to integrate seamlessly with C applications through a clean and compact C API and bytecode VM.
Lua Was Engineered for Embedded
Lua isn’t just compatible with embedded systems; the Lua ANSI C library was designed for them. Its architecture is clean, compact, and deterministic.
MicroPython, on the other hand, is a reimplementation of Python 3. It works well for many embedded use cases, but it inherits assumptions from a desktop-oriented language. You’ll hit limitations faster, especially when working under tight resource constraints.
Seamless C Integration is Core to Lua
This is where Lua really pulls ahead; Lua is built to be embedded in and extended by C. The API is stable, minimal, and easy to work with. You can expose your own C/C++ functions and data structures to Lua in minutes, not hours.
MicroPython also supports C extensions, although the process is more involved. It often requires custom firmware builds and a more brittle workflow. Lua’s C interop isn’t a workaround. It’s the design philosophy.
How Do I Integrate My C (or C++) Components with Lua?
... continue reading