GoKawiil
1.
2.
Scientists using LLMs will ‘do more, less well’, modelling study predicts
(feeds.nature.com)
3.
Papers with open peer-review reports are less likely to be retracted
(feeds.nature.com)
4.
What happens when you try to chop a photon in half?
(arstechnica.com)
5.
How we measured AI writing across arXiv, and where the measurement breaks
(news.ycombinator.com)
6.
Over 30% of new ArXiv submissions now read as AI-written
(news.ycombinator.com)
7.
Daily briefing: Preprints are chock-full of authors’ private info
(feeds.nature.com)
8.
Show HN: I mapped 8.5M research papers into an interactive atlas
(news.ycombinator.com)
9.
Whoops! Most arXiv papers contain information never meant to be shared
(feeds.nature.com)
10.
ArXiv's Next Chapter
(news.ycombinator.com)
11.
Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?
(arstechnica.com)
12.
The first ticking ‘nuclear clocks’ are here — what can they do?
(feeds.nature.com)
13.
14.
A giant star may have destroyed itself in one of the rarest explosions
(news.ycombinator.com)
15.
16.
Daily briefing: Bogus citations will get you banned from arXiv
(feeds.nature.com)
17.
Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited
(feeds.nature.com)
18.
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
(feeds.nature.com)
19.
‘It is incredible’: How AI is transforming mathematics
(feeds.nature.com)
20.
21.
22.
23.
ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
(slashdot.org)
24.
ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop
(theverge.com)
25.
New arXiv policy: 1-year ban for hallucinated references
(news.ycombinator.com)
26.
Hallucinated citations highest in social sciences preprints site
(feeds.nature.com)
27.
Show HN: Apple's Sharp Running in the Browser via ONNX Runtime Web
(news.ycombinator.com)
28.
Alignment whack-a-mole: Finetuning activates recall of copyrighted books in LLMs
(news.ycombinator.com)
29.
Friendlier LLMs tell users what they want to hear — even when it is wrong
(feeds.nature.com)
30.