The South Korean government has officially denied Elon Musk’s request for documents from the Kakao super app in xAI’s lawsuit against Apple. Here are the details.
xAI might still have a shot at getting some of the requested documents
Over the past few months, xAI’s Iegal team has sent letters to several Asian super app developers, seeking documents it believes would support its claim that Apple’s App Store rules are unfair.
We explored the situation in detail in this post, but in a nutshell, here’s what’s going on: Elon Musk complained on Twitter that Apple’s partnership with OpenAI was preempting Grok from succeeding in the App Store. Immediately after that, xAI filed a lawsuit against both companies.
In the lawsuit, xAI argues a somewhat different point. The company alleges that Apple’s App Store rules unlawfully restrain super apps, as an attempt to prevent users from switching away from the iPhone. They also argue that Apple’s partnership with OpenAI reinforces this restriction against super apps.
Since acquiring Twitter, Musk has fixated on turning X into a super app, a category that has seen enormous success in Asia. These apps bundle services like ride-hailing, food delivery, payments, streaming, and chat into a single platform, a model that has yet to gain real traction in Western markets.
So, in its attempt to compel Apple to change the App Store’s rules, xAI has been resorting to an international treaty, called The Hague Convention, to formally request documents from super app companies based in Asian countries, including Alipay in China and Kakao Corporation in Korea.
In the letters xAI states that “Apple’s conduct illegally restrains competition from ‘super apps,’” and proceeds to request the following:
Please produce all requested Documents in Your possession, custody, or control, or available to You, or to which You may gain access through reasonable effort, including information in the possession of Your past and present attorneys, accountants, investigators, consultants, agents, or other persons directly or indirectly employed or retained by You, or any entity otherwise subject to Your control who maintains records on Your behalf, in Your name, or otherwise under Your control. Subject to a valid claim of privilege, please produce the entire Document if any part of that Document is responsive.
And
... continue reading