GoKawiilSign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!
Commercial satellite imagery captured last week shows the eerie devastation following the bombing of an Iranian elementary school. At least 175 people, including a large number of young schoolgirls, were killed in the attack. Haunting drone footage showed excavators digging dozens of graves for the victims.
The airstrike, allegedly part of an offensive targeting an Iranian military complex nearby, provided a grotesque example of the horrors unfolding since the beginning of the US-Israel war on Iran late last month.
The massacre also raised a grim technological question. It had already been reported that the US military has been using Anthropic’s Claude to select targets during the attacks on Iran — and, strikingly, the Pentagon refused to confirm or deny whether AI had any role in the school’s bombing when Futurism asked.
At first, neither the US nor Israel wanted to take blame for the carnage. US president Donald Trump desperately tried to steer clear as well, claiming that Iran had murdered its own children in cold blood.
Now, as the New York Times reports, US officials have confirmed that a US military Tomahawk missile strike was indeed responsible for the bloodbath at the school. According to a preliminary finding, officers at the US Central Command “created the target coordinates for the strike using outdated data provided by the Defense Intelligence Agency,” sources briefed on the matter told the newspaper.
Strikingly, the NYT also reports that the military is investigating whether “any artificial intelligence models, data crunching programs or other technical intelligence gathering means were to blame for the mistaken targeting of the school.”
Claude, the newspaper’s sources noted, works with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s Maven Smart System to “identify points of interest for military intelligence officers.”
Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, officials told the paper, it was ultimately “human error” to bomb the school, regardless of how the target was selected in the first place.
According to the NYT‘s own analysis of historical satellite imagery that dates back to 2013, it’s likely Central Command officials may have been working with outdated information. The imagery shows that the school was fenced off from the nearby military base between 2013 and 2016.
... continue reading