GoKawiilThe dispute itself was unremarkable. The Insolvency and Companies Court was hearing a claim brought by Lithuanian firm UAB Business Enterprise and Laimonas Jakštys over who owned and controlled Oneta Limited. Jakštys was seeking a declaration that he and UAB Business Enterprise owned Oneta, rectification of the company's register, and...Read Entire Article
A London judge says a witness was being coached in real time through smart glasses
Why This Matters
This case highlights the growing concerns over real-time coaching and surveillance through smart glasses, raising questions about privacy, authenticity, and the potential misuse of augmented reality devices in legal and professional settings. It underscores the need for clearer regulations and safeguards as wearable technology becomes more integrated into daily and legal activities.
Key Takeaways
- Smart glasses can be used for real-time coaching, raising privacy concerns.
- Legal cases may need to consider the influence of augmented reality devices.
- The incident emphasizes the importance of regulating wearable technology in sensitive environments.
Get alerts for these topics