Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Hair-raising: how carbon contamination can drive static charging

read original get Electrostatic Discharge Tester → more articles
Why This Matters

This research highlights how ubiquitous carbon contamination on surfaces influences static electricity buildup, even causing asymmetric charging in identical materials. Understanding this phenomenon is crucial for improving the predictability and control of triboelectric effects in electronic devices and industrial processes, ultimately enhancing safety and performance for consumers and industries alike.

Key Takeaways

NEWS AND VIEWS

18 March 2026 Hair-raising: how carbon contamination can drive static charging Objects made from the same insulator can sometimes acquire different charges when rubbed together, owing to a thin layer of carbon-based material on the object’s surface. By Simone Ciampi ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-8454 0 Simone Ciampi Simone Ciampi is in the School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia. View author publications PubMed Google Scholar

Insulating materials, which are those that resist the flow of electricity, accumulate electrical charges when rubbed or slid against another surface, or when indented or bent1–3. This phenomenon is known as contact electrification or triboelectric charging. Examples in everyday life can be both amusing and dramatic4: hair standing on end, a party balloon sticking to walls and, at larger scales, lightning and dust storms. However, triboelectric charging is hard to predict. A particularly puzzling example is the asymmetric charging of two objects made from the same material which, according to simple theory, should not occur. Writing in Nature, Grosjean et al.5 report that surface contamination from carbon compounds, which is present on nearly all objects that are exposed to air, can cause this same-material contact electrification.

Nature 651, 589-590 (2026)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-00631-8

References Vasquez-Sancho, F., Abdollahi, A., Damjanovic, D. & Catalan, G. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705316 (2018). Jamieson, W. Nature 83, 189 (1910). Olson, K. P. & Marks, L. D. Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 104501 (2025). Wilson, N. J. Electrostat. 4, 67–84 (1977). Grosjean, G. et al. Nature 651, 626–631 (2026). Wilcke, J. C. Disputatio Physica Experimentalis, de Electricitatibus Contrariis. PhD dissertation, Academia Rostochiensi (1757). Waitukaitis, S. R., Lee, V., Pierson, J. M., Forman, S. L. & Jaeger, H. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 218001 (2014). Mizzi, C. A. & Marks, L. D. Nano Lett. 22, 3939–3945 (2022). Iversen, P. & Lacks, D. J. J. Electrostat. 70, 309–311 (2012). Šutka, A. et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 33140–33147 (2023). Aragonès, A. C. et al. Nature 531, 88–91 (2016). Inculet, I. I. J. Electrostat. 4, 175–192 (1978). Download references

Competing Interests The author declares no competing interests.

Related Articles

Subjects