GoKawiilThe version that arrived in your mailbox is truncated. Visit the full article here to view the rest.
Backups of this article:
https://archive.is/HokPb
https://archive.ph/YTsgc
https://web.archive.org/web/20260319020740/https://deepdelver.substack.com/p/delve-fake-compliance-as-a-service
Reporters who want to get in touch: Drop an email at [email protected]. In case my Proton account gets blocked or you don’t get an answer, tweet using the hashtag #AICPNAY with contact details and I’ll do my best to get in touch with you.
At its core, this article argues that Delve fakes compliance while creating the appearance of compliance without the underlying substance.
Delve achieves its claim of being the fastest platform by producing fake evidence, generating auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp reports, and skipping major framework requirements while telling clients they have achieved 100% compliance. Their “US-based auditors” are Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells and mailbox agents. Auditors breach independence rules by signing off anyway, leaving companies unknowingly exposed to criminal liability under HIPAA and hefty fines under GDPR.
Delve hands customers fabricated evidence of board meetings, tests, and processes that never happened. The platform forces companies to choose between adopting fake evidence or performing mostly manual work with little real automation or AI. It produces audit reports that falsely claim independent verification while Delve itself effectively wears the auditor hat, generating identical reports for all clients, including Lovable, Bland, Cluely, and NASDAQ-traded Duos Edge. It hosts trust pages that list security measures that were never implemented.
When clients ask hard questions, Delve dodges. They demand calls where founders charm, promise, and namedrop Lovable, Bland, and “every Fortune 500” as proof. When that fails, donuts arrive.
... continue reading