Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

If Microsoft wants Windows 12 to succeed, it can't let history repeat itself - let me explain

read original get Windows 11 Official Mug → more articles
Why This Matters

Microsoft's upcoming Windows 12 faces significant challenges, including hardware requirements and potential subscription models, which could impact user adoption and industry standards. The company's focus on evolving Windows while maintaining support for existing versions highlights its strategic balancing act in the tech ecosystem. Ensuring a smooth transition will be crucial for maintaining consumer trust and competitive edge.

Key Takeaways

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.

ZDNet's key takeaways

Windows 12 isn't coming this year - here's the timeline I'm betting on.

You'll likely need AI-optimized hardware, and your old apps might not work.

I expect paid subscriptions will be required for advanced features.

We are at a rare moment in Microsoft history, when the company that defined the modern PC is supporting a single version of its flagship operating system. Windows 10 is officially unsupported as of October 2025. Windows 11 now stands alone in the market, with a billion active users, according to Microsoft's most recent quarterly earnings report. In October 2026, Windows 11 will celebrate its fifth anniversary -- which is traditionally the halfway point in Microsoft's 10-year support lifecycle.

Also: Microsoft announces sweeping Windows changes - but no apologies

That all suggests the next version of Windows -- let's call it Windows 12 -- will be here before you know it, ready or not. In fact, earlier this month, PCWorld, a reliable source of technology news, published a startling report (translated from its German counterpart, PC-Welt) claiming that Windows 12 would arrive in 2026. On Reddit, a post discussing the article went viral, gathering 18,000 upvotes and inspiring nearly 7,000 comments.

Then, a few hours later, executive editor Brad Chacos posted an apology and a retraction: "This article ... does not meet PCWorld's standards and should not have been published." (Full disclosure: I was once managing editor of PC World, when it was a print magazine. Having to write that sort of retraction would have been my worst nightmare.)

... continue reading