Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

There’s Something Very Dark About a Lot of Those Viral AI Fruit Videos

read original get AI-Generated Fruit Art Kit → more articles
Why This Matters

The viral AI fruit videos highlight a troubling trend of dark and violent narratives in AI-generated content, raising concerns about the impact of such media on viewers and the potential normalization of harmful stereotypes. As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent and engaging, it underscores the need for increased awareness and ethical considerations in digital media creation and consumption.

Key Takeaways

Over the past five days, an Instagram account called FruitvilleGossip has racked up more than 300,000 views on a series of videos called Fruit Paternity Court.

Featuring a cast of AI fruit characters, the entirely AI-generated show pits a clementine mother of a baby tangerine against his prospective parent, Mr. Mike the mango. Then Dr. Lime delivers an envelope containing the results of a DNA test to the judge: Mr. Mike is not the father.

“Idk why I’m invested in the lives of these fruit people,” says one comment. But they aren’t alone. “Come on last episode please drop it tonight we need it,” begs another.

Across viral AI fruit videos, which have overtaken many social media feeds over the past week, one theme sticks out: women fruit characters facing humiliating scenarios and even violence.

Repeatedly, fruit women in the videos cheat on their fruit husbands and boyfriends, often getting exposed and losing everything. Fruit babies born out of wedlock are thus often the wrong variety of fruit. In response, the fruit women get slapped and berated, and sometimes the fruit baby even gets thrown out the window to its death. There are AI fruit videos that that heavily suggest acts of sexual violence. Fruit parents have sex with the friends of their fruit children. Fruit parents verbally abuse their fruit children. The fruit women and their fruit children also get chased by sharks, ground up in blenders, and boiled alive.

Bizarrely, a number of the videos punish female AI fruit characters just for farting, with fruit men repeatedly kicking them out of their homes and even jailing them for passing gas.

When asked why he thinks these kinds of narratives are so popular, the creator of Fruit Paternity Court, a 20-year-old UK-based computer science student who declined to share his name with WIRED, said over DMs that they get the most views. Making the characters “look as appealing as possible” and engaging in “super dramatic and scandalous” scenes is apparently what people want to see.

The Fruit Paternity Court creator says he was inspired to make AI fruit dramas after seeing similar videos take off. He says his videos are created with text-to-video AI generators like Google Veo, Kling AI, or Sora (OpenAI’s video generation app, which the company said will be shutting down soon in a surprise Tuesday announcement).

The creator even shared a prompt he said he used to generate a clip for one of his videos: “Anthropomorphic strawberry character with a sassy facial expression, small jeweled crown on her leaf, glossy red skin, thin cartoon arms and legs, hands on hips. Confident pose. Hyper-saturated colors, soft studio lighting, white background. Pixar-meets-brainrot style. Full body shot, 9:16 vertical format.”

The prompt specifying a Pixar-style animation is ironic considering that Disney’s deal with OpenAI to introduce its characters to Sora is dissolving. But in the land of Fruit Paternity Court, the company’s beloved animation style is still being repurposed to show fruit women cheating on fruit men and facing the consequences. Disney did not respond to a request for comment.

... continue reading