GoKawiilTwo liberal justices sided with the conservative majority in the landslide vote, which struck down Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy for minors. In 2019, Colorado adopted a law prohibiting conversion therapy for minors. It defined the controversial term as any practice or treatment attempting “to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.” But a talk therapist from the state, Kasey Chiles, said the law inhibited her right to free speech in her practice—and as of a ruling on Tuesday, March 31, the Supreme Court voted overwhelmingly in her favor.
Supreme Court conversion therapy ruling ignores history of harm in the name of ‘free speech.’ It could set a chilling precedent
Why This Matters
The Supreme Court's decision to strike down Colorado's ban on conversion therapy raises concerns about prioritizing free speech over the well-documented harms of such practices. This ruling could set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing similar restrictions on efforts to protect vulnerable minors from harmful treatments. It highlights the ongoing tension between free speech rights and safeguarding mental health, especially for marginalized communities.
Key Takeaways
- The ruling overturns protections for minors against harmful conversion therapy.
- It emphasizes free speech rights over the recognition of the therapy's proven harms.
- The decision may influence future legal battles around mental health and LGBTQ+ protections.
Get alerts for these topics