Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

How to Choose a PR Firm in the Age of AI — and What Most Companies Get Wrong

read original get PR Firm Selection Guide → more articles
Why This Matters

In the evolving landscape of AI-driven information retrieval, traditional PR metrics like media placements are no longer sufficient. Instead, companies need to focus on how their coverage influences the digital footprint that AI systems rely on for information, making strategic visibility and authoritative citations crucial. This shift underscores the importance of selecting PR firms that understand and can navigate the new AI-centric environment to enhance brand authority and discoverability.

Key Takeaways

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways It’s no longer enough to be published; what matters is whether coverage creates a footprint, gets cited, linked to and used in the sources AI systems draw from.

A serious PR firm should be able to tell you which publications carry actual weight in your category (not just which ones have large audiences) and connect media activity to specific pages/topics on your site that you’re trying to build authority around.

Before hiring anyone, test how they think about AI visibility — and be skeptical of easy answers. Ask them to walk you through the sources that shape AI results in your category and how they’d get you into them.

There’s a moment I keep seeing play out at almost every company that’s been doing PR for a few years. Someone pulls up a press hit they’re proud of, a real publication, a real story. Then I ask them to open Claude or ChatGPT and search for the problem their company solves. Their brand doesn’t show up. A competitor does. Sometimes a competitor that’s never been in a single notable publication.

That’s the thing nobody warned them about. Visibility used to be about getting written up. Now it’s about getting woven in to the sources, citations and patterns that AI systems trust when they decide what to surface. Those are two very different games, and most PR firms are still playing the first one.

If you’re evaluating agencies right now, here’s what actually separates firms that can operate in this environment from firms that are pretending to.

Placements are an input, not an outcome

The coverage-as-success model made sense when readers actually followed stories from publication to company. That handoff broke down long before AI entered the picture. What matters now is whether coverage creates a footprint, whether it gets cited, linked to, and pulled into the broader web of sources that AI systems draw from when constructing answers.

Don’t ask how many placements a firm has generated or what the combined reach was. Ask what those placements led to. Did other publications reference them? Did they attract inbound links? Do they still surface in searches on the topic months later? A firm that can answer those questions with specifics has a fundamentally different understanding of what PR is building toward. Most can’t, because most haven’t been asked to think that way.

... continue reading