Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Even "cat readme.txt" is not safe

read original get USB Data Blocker → more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights a critical security vulnerability in iTerm2's SSH integration, demonstrating how seemingly harmless commands like 'cat readme.txt' can be exploited to execute malicious code. It underscores the importance of understanding the complex interactions between terminal emulators and remote protocols, which can pose significant risks to both developers and everyday users. As terminal emulators become more feature-rich, ensuring their security against such exploits is vital for safeguarding sensitive data and systems in the tech industry.

Key Takeaways

In a previous post about AI-discovered bugs in Vim and Emacs, we looked at how seemingly harmless workflows could cross a surprising line into code execution. This time we wanted to push that idea even further: is cat readme.txt safe?

It turns out that it is NOT, if you use iTerm2.

That looks insane until you understand what iTerm2 is trying to do for a legitimate feature, how it uses the PTY, and what happens when terminal output is able to impersonate one side of that feature's protocol.

We'd like to acknowledge OpenAI for partnering with us on this project.

Background: iTerm2's SSH integration

iTerm2 has an SSH integration feature that gives it a richer understanding of remote sessions. To make that work, it does not just "blindly type commands" into a remote shell. Instead, it bootstraps a tiny helper script on the remote side called the conductor.

The rough model is:

iTerm2 launches SSH integration, usually through it2ssh . iTerm2 sends a remote bootstrap script, the conductor, over the existing SSH session. That remote script becomes the protocol peer for iTerm2. iTerm2 and the remote conductor exchange terminal escape sequences to coordinate things like: discovering the login shell

checking for Python

changing directories

... continue reading