Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Here’s how Amazon’s price fixing allegedly drove up prices everywhere

read original get Amazon Price Fixing Report → more articles
Why This Matters

The allegations against Amazon reveal potential collusion to artificially inflate prices, which could harm consumers and distort fair competition in the retail industry. This case highlights the importance of regulatory oversight in maintaining a competitive marketplace and protecting consumer interests. If proven true, it could lead to significant legal and financial repercussions for Amazon and reshape how online retail operates.

Key Takeaways

is a senior editor following news across tech, culture, policy, and entertainment. He joined The Verge in 2021 after several years covering news at Engadget.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

On Monday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta revealed the evidence of alleged price-fixing by Amazon. The state filed a request to the Supreme Court in February for a preliminary injunction to stop Amazon’s behavior while the lawsuit it originally filed in 2022 proceeds, and is now making that 16-page document available, “largely unredacted.” It lays out how Amazon allegedly schemed to raise other retailers’ prices ahead of Prime Day, or worked with its vendors to make sure items available at a discount elsewhere were suddenly out of stock and unavailable for the lower price.

Bonta says this document shows how the scheme works with Amazon, vendors, and its supposed competition, like Walmart, Target, Best Buy, Chewy, and Home Depot, in three ways:

Amazon or its competitor, through their common vendor, will agree to increase the retail price or make a product temporarily unavailable, so that the other retailer can match the increased market price, increasing the price for consumers.

A competitor offering a cheaper price on a product will increase its retail price at Amazon’s request (a request made through the vendor), so that Amazon can then match that increased retail price, thereby increasing the price for consumers.

The vendor removes a product from a competing retailer that is offering a lower price than Amazon, so that the lower price is no longer available in the market and Amazon then raises its retail price, resulting in a higher price for consumers.

Two examples from the document (available in full below) jump out, like this one where Amazon sent Levi’s examples of lower prices on Walmart.com, and a response from Levi’s confirming that “I talked to Walmart and they have partnered with us to… take Easy Khaki Classic fit back up to ladder SPP price, $29.99 immediately.”

Image: California AGs office

Another example alleged by Bonta is communication showing Amazon asking vendors like Scotts and Hanes to “look into” raising prices on competing websites. In the Scotts example, it specifically cites Amazon’s self-created Prime Day event as a reason to raise the price for a few days.

... continue reading