Stephan Schlamminger (left) and colleague Vincent Lee with the equipment used to measure big G.Credit: R. Eskalis/NIST
The value of the constant that describes the gravitational pull between objects, Big G, continues to baffle scientists. A decade-long replication experiment1 that involved moving equipment across the Atlantic has resulted in a number that disagrees with previous results, and also differs from the current best estimate of G.
The new measurement gives important clues as to where the original experiment, conducted by researchers at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Paris and published in 2013, went wrong. But its failure to match the internationally agreed CODATA value has left physicists no closer to pinning down G’s true value.
Is gravity quantum? Experiments could finally probe one of physics’ biggest questions
The work is “soul draining”, says Stephan Schlamminger, a physicist at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, Maryland, who led the latest work. But he says he is driven by the challenge. “It must be possible for humans to measure this number.”
Studies of G have also often had to be a side hustle for scientists because, although it describes the strength of gravity, its value is rarely needed in practice. Most applications, such as calculating the motions of planets, only require the value of G multiplied by a mass, such as that of the Sun, and measurements can determine the combined value to high precision.
Although hunting for G helps to “sharpen your axe” for other precision experiments, right now “it's a pretty useless number”, says Schlamminger.
The “meticulous” work of the NIST team should help future experimenters, says Richard Brown, a metrologist at the UK National Physical Laboratory in Teddington. The work “is a great leap forward in this respect,” he says.
Fiendish force
Efforts to measure the gravitational constant date back to 1798, and since then have expanded to a variety of methods, involving swinging pendulums, balancing masses and charting the paths taken by atoms. “In my opinion, it is the most challenging laboratory experiment of all,” says Christian Rothleitner, a physicist at the German National Metrology Institute (PTB) in Braunschweig.
... continue reading