Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Human cooperation undergoes constant breakdown and repair

read original get Cooperation and Conflict Board Game → more articles
Why This Matters

This research highlights that human cooperation is inherently fragile, requiring continuous effort to maintain and renew. Recognizing that cooperation can erode over time emphasizes the importance for organizations and policymakers to actively foster collaborative behavior, ensuring social and economic stability. For consumers and the tech industry, this underscores the need for ongoing engagement and trust-building in digital platforms and collaborative projects.

Key Takeaways

NEWS AND VIEWS

22 April 2026 Human cooperation undergoes constant breakdown and repair Real-world data reveal that cooperation continually falls and rebounds. Motivation to cooperate must therefore be actively renewed rather than assumed to sustain itself. By Jiabin Wu ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-9678 0 Jiabin Wu Jiabin Wu is in the Department of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA. View author publications PubMed Google Scholar

Why do humans cooperate with each other? This question has long been of interest to social and behavioural scientists because social dilemmas create a conflict between individual material incentives (such as financial gain) and collective efficiency. Cooperation produces socially desirable outcomes, but withdrawal from cooperation (known as defection) is often rational for people or groups acting in their own self-interest. Even so, human societies have repeatedly shown a striking capacity to sustain cooperation in practice — although achieving cooperation does not mean that it is permanent. Writing in Nature, Sabin et al.1 show that cooperative behaviour can erode over time, even after it has been established successfully. Their findings suggest that cooperation might need to be renewed and defended continually, rather than be assumed to persist once it emerges.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01048-z

References Sabin, N., Klinowski, D. & Reed-Tsochas, F. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10380-3 (2026). Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty (Penguin, 2019). Dekel, E., Ely, J. C. & Yilankaya, O. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74, 685–704 (2007). Akçay, E., Van Cleve, J., Feldman, M. W. & Roughgarden, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19061–19066 (2009). Alger, I. & Weibull, J. W. Econometrica 81, 2269–2302 (2013). Wang, Z. & Wu, J. Preprint at SSRN http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4426394 (2026). Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. (eds) Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life (MIT Press, 2005). Bowles, S. & Hwang, S.-H. J. Public Econ. 92, 1811–1820 (2008). Bierbrauer, F., Ockenfels, A., Pollak, A. & Rückert, D. J. Public Econ. 149, 59–80 (2017). Wu, J. & Xiong, S. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6553660 (2026). Download references

Competing Interests The author declares no competing interests.

Related Articles

Subjects