GoKawiilI’m exhausted by it. Every time a field like tech, finance, engineering, or even podcasts tilts toward male success, the cultural narrative kicks in: This is sexist! This is exclusionary! This must be fixed! Yet no one bats an eye when nursing, teaching, therapy or veterinary medicine are overwhelmingly female. The double standard is frustrating, and it’s doing real damage. We’ve spent decades treating male ambition not as a force that built civilization, but as a problem to be solved. It’s time to stop.
Take the podcasting world, which has become the latest battleground in this war. Critics frame the success of male-hosted shows like the ones led by Joe Rogan, Theo Vonn, Chris Williamson and Andrew Huberman as some kind of “manosphere” conspiracy, implying women are being edged out. The Wall Street Journal recently ran a piece talking about the male dominance in top podcasts and cheered on a new show from Maria Sharapova spotlighting “ambitious women.” What’s conveniently downplayed is the long list of massively popular female-hosted podcasts that thrive today—shows that have huge audiences of women and, in many cases, promote an open contempt for men.
The truth is simpler and less sinister than the narrative that’s being pushed: anyone can start a podcast. From my bedroom, right now, I could launch five! Equipment costs next to nothing, distribution is free, and the audience decides what rises. If men dominate the top charts, it’s because they’re connecting with listeners, many of them men, who crave unfiltered conversation on topics like business, politics, philosophy, and even personal responsibility.
But the podcast panic is just one example of a deeper problem. For decades, we’ve systematically demonized male ambition under the banner of “equity.” In schools, we pour resources into girls’ STEM programs, leadership groups, and other career success initiatives while boys are left to fend for themselves. We tell young men to “step up” while simultaneously demanding they “step aside” so women can shine. We urge them to “open up” about their emotions, only to shame them the moment those emotions don’t align with progressive rhetoric. Boys learn early that their drive, their competitiveness, their desire to build and conquer is suspect and something to be shamed away rather than celebrated.
The results of this are predictable and heartbreaking. Young men today are struggling with purpose, direction, motivation and hope. Suicide rates for males remain tragically high. Workforce participation among men in their prime is dropping. A growing group feels angry, bitter, and invisible. We chant about “toxic masculinity” and then act shocked when the boys we raised without positive outlets for their natural energies turn inward or lash out. We’ve told an entire generation of males that their ambition is bad for society, then wonder why so many check out.
This isn’t just cultural self-sabotage—it’s historically illiterate. Let’s be real. Male ambition is the engine that brought humanity out of the dirt and into modernity. Throughout history, men have been driven to protect, provide, and achieve status, often to win the admiration of women and secure their place in the social order. That drive built cities, invented technologies, crossed oceans, and even split the atom—with the love, help and support of women, of course.
Nikola Tesla, the visionary inventor and a mind a century ahead of his time, understood this. I’ve written about his views on men and women before, and I believe he was always on point. He argued that much of our progress stemmed from men’s deep-seated desire to provide and impress, and he worried that forcing men and women into identical roles would stifle the ambition that powers innovation. Tesla saw the complementarity of the sexes, not their sameness.
Camille Paglia, the brilliant and fearless cultural critic who I’ve admired for years, put it even more bluntly: If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts. She wasn’t insulting women but stating a truth about our evolutionary paths. Women, on average, excel at nurturing, relationship-building, managing and sustaining communities. Men, on average, have driven the innovation, provision, risk-taking, and large-scale problem-solving that define our progress. Both are amazing and essential for humanity. Pretending otherwise doesn’t make us more enlightened; it makes us delusional.
We’re living in the world male ambition built. The phones we use to tweet about “the patriarchy,” the airplanes that let us travel and post on Instagram, the medical advances that slashed maternal mortality, and the internet that allows anti-men memes to go viral are the fruits of restless, ambitious men who refused to accept the status quo. To demonize their ambition while enjoying its benefits is the height of ingratitude.
And yet here we are, in an economy that now increasingly rewards feminine-coded traits like collaboration and nurturing. Male-dominated sectors like manufacturing and construction are shrinking or being automated away. Women have surged into higher education and the white-collar workforce, which is wonderful. But instead of cheering male excellence in the areas where men still lead, we shame it. We frame every male success as a woman’s loss. Every boardroom with more men than women becomes proof of systemic bias rather than evidence of different interests, risk tolerances, or life choices. This zero-sum thinking is poison.
... continue reading