GoKawiilRyan Haines / Android Authority
TL;DR Apple is reportedly considering changing its MagSafe strategy.
This could potentially mean some future iPhones will ship without magnetic charging built in.
Less competition around magnetic charging would likely be bad for Qi2 adoption, but the Qi2 standard is independent and not directly influenced by Apple.
Android’s been slow to catch onto magnetic wireless charging, with Google only first implementing it in last year’s Pixel 10 series and segment leader Samsung still not offering full Qi2 compatibility in any device. A new rumor about Apple’s MagSafe could be bad news for Qi2’s future prospects on Android.
As spotted by MacRumors, leaker Instant Digital has claimed on Weibo that there’s internal debate at Apple as to whether MagSafe should be a standard feature in future iPhones. Apple changing tack and pulling MagSafe from at least some of its iPhones would probably mean fewer Android models shipping with MagSafe-compatible Qi2 hardware, too.
Don’t want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a favorite source in Google Discover to never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more.
to never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. You can also set us as a preferred source in Google Search by clicking the button below.
It’s impossible to know how serious the purported internal discussions about MagSafe’s future are, assuming they’re happening at all. The standard feature phrasing is ambiguous, too: Are features that ship in iPhone Pro models but not base-model iPhones standard? (That we’re working from a machine-translated version of Instant Digital’s post doesn’t make things any clearer, either.)
MacRumors points another recent rumor (again from Instant Digital) that Apple is eyeing potential year-over-year downgrades in the base-model iPhone 18 to cut manufacturing costs. It’s feasible that built-in MagSafe could be one of those downgrades; Apple could point its non-Pro customers to MagSafe-enabling cases, instead.
... continue reading