Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

‘Make Pluto a planet again’? NASA chief revives debate that divides astronomers

read original get Pluto Retro Planet Mug → more articles
Why This Matters

The debate over reinstating Pluto as a planet highlights ongoing tensions within the astronomical community and raises questions about how scientific classifications influence public perception and funding priorities. NASA's potential involvement underscores the importance of scientific consensus in shaping space exploration and research agendas, especially amidst budget constraints. This controversy reflects broader challenges in balancing scientific debates with policy and resource allocation in the tech and space sectors.

Key Takeaways

Will Pluto become a planet again?Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute

Many of us are old enough to have grown up with nine planets orbiting the Sun. In 2006, however, a controversial decision within the astronomy community resulted in the official list being cut to eight, removing Pluto.

On Tuesday, responding to a question during a testimony to a US Senate committee, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said he was firmly on the side of restoring Pluto’s lost planetary status, and that the agency was “working on some papers right now to escalate through the scientific community to revisit this”. It is unclear what papers Isaacman was referring to; NASA did not respond to a request for clarification.

Isaacman’s remark triggered debate among researchers with some backing the proposal and others being forcefully against it. “The question of whether or not we should call Pluto a planet distracts from the real scientific issues,” says Amanda Hendrix, a researcher at the Planetary Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado.

What has riled some astronomers was that Isaacman’s remark came at the end of a testimony in which he endorsed the United States Administration’s proposal to halve NASA’s science budget. Together with cuts at the National Science Foundation, many astronomers feel that their field is under siege. “It's wild to ‘make Pluto a planet again’ while decimating the careers of those of us that study it,” planetary scientist Adeene Denton wrote on BlueSky.

Pluto probe offers eye-popping view of neighbouring star Proxima Centauri

David Grinspoon, an astrobiologist in at the Planetary Science Institute in Washington DC, was among those who had originally opposed to Pluto being demoted, and he still is. He says that there is still “a genuine debate” on this controversy and favours reopening the discussion.

However, he adds that NASA weighing in on the subject could be counterproductive because it’s a decision that should be taken at the international level. The real authority on what counts as a planet lies with the International Astronomical Union (IAU), the body that establishes official astronomical terminology.

“Even though I would like to ultimately see a better definition widely agreed upon, you can’t have NASA declare this,” says Grinspoon.

Distracting debate

... continue reading