Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways The digital industry has traded quality for performance. Since nearly everything can be measured, the temptation to let those numbers stand in for quality is nearly irresistible.
A culture of “learned timidity” emerges when data overrides judgment. Teams become skilled at making work that avoids criticism, not work that is genuinely good.
Rebuilding a craft culture inside a metrics-driven industry happens through the repeated choice to hold the work to a standard that the data alone cannot confirm.
At some point in the last 15 years, the digital industry made a quiet trade. It gave up the harder conversation about whether the work was good and replaced it with the easier conversation about whether the work performed. This was not a conspiracy or a deliberate choice. It was the natural result of building creative disciplines inside an infrastructure that could measure almost everything.
When you can quantify reach, time on page, scroll depth, conversion rate and return visits down to the decimal, the temptation to let those numbers stand in for quality is nearly irresistible. Numbers feel like objectivity. Objectivity feels like safety. And in an industry that moves as fast as ours does, safety is always appealing.
The problem is that performance and quality are related but not the same thing, and optimizing relentlessly for one does not reliably produce the other. A website that converts well is not necessarily a website that is well-made. A campaign that goes viral is not necessarily a campaign that says something true.
A digital product with strong retention numbers is not necessarily a digital product that respects the people using it. These distinctions used to be part of how the industry talked about its own work. They have become harder to make as the dashboards have gotten more sophisticated, because the dashboard is always ready with a simpler answer to a more complicated question.
The slow erosion nobody announces
Authenticity does not disappear from an organization in a single meeting. It leaves gradually, through a hundred small decisions that each seem reasonable at the time.
... continue reading