Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Apple pushes back against Canadian bill that could force companies to weaken encryption

read original get Apple Encryption Security Kit → more articles
Why This Matters

Apple's opposition to Canada's Bill C-22 highlights the ongoing global debate over government access to encrypted data and the importance of maintaining user privacy. The bill's potential to force companies to weaken encryption could undermine security standards and erode consumer trust in digital privacy protections. This development underscores the industry's challenge in balancing law enforcement needs with robust security and privacy safeguards.

Key Takeaways

Apple and Meta are publicly opposing a new Canadian bill that they say could force tech companies to break encryption or build backdoors into their products. Here are the details.

New country, old issue

Last year, Apple got into a high-profile dispute with the British government after the UK issued an order forcing companies to put backdoors in their encryption systems.

This prompted Apple to stop offering Advanced Data Protection to new users in the country, while existing users would eventually be required to disable it. The British government reportedly ended up backing down under pressure from the US.

At the time, Apple made it clear that it had never, and would never “buil(d) a backdoor or master key to any of (its) products or services.“

This very public spat rekindled a debate over government access to encrypted Apple user data that was reminiscent of the San Bernardino case, when the FBI made a similar request before dropping it after finding another way into the iPhone without Apple’s help.

Flash-forward to today, and Apple is again potentially facing a similar situation, this time in Canada. As reported by Reuters, a new bill could give the government power to force companies to break encryption or build backdoors into their products.

The proposal, known as Bill C-22, would expand the investigative tools available to Canadian law enforcement for accessing digital information tied to criminal investigations.

Although it does not specifically mention encryption, Apple argues that the proposal’s access powers could still be used to compel companies to weaken encrypted services.

Here’s Apple to Reuters:

... continue reading