Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Dentists Are Using AI to Scare Patients Into Unnecessary Dental Work, According to an Explosive Investigation

read original get AI Dental Diagnostic Tool → more articles
Why This Matters

This investigation highlights how AI tools in dentistry may be used to overdiagnose and push unnecessary treatments, raising concerns about ethical practices and patient trust in the tech-driven healthcare industry. For consumers, it underscores the importance of seeking multiple opinions and being cautious of AI-driven recommendations. The widespread adoption of AI in healthcare also prompts a need for regulation and transparency to protect patient interests.

Key Takeaways

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

Is your dentist upselling you on something? Does your old filling really need to be replaced, and is that tooth decay really bad enough to warrant new work?

Such suspicions have probably crossed your mind before as you laid there in tense anticipation of the noisy drill about to send stomach-churning vibrations through your teeth, and they’re not going to go away once you hear about how dentists across the country are embracing AI tools.

In her new book “I Am Not a Robot: My Year Using AI to Do (Almost) Everything,” former Wall Street Journal columnist Joanna Stern recalls how a routine trip to the dentist’s office led her to unearthing the disturbing way that AI is being used to push unnecessary treatments.

“Similarly to how AI is being used in radiology for breasts or gallbladder, et cetera, it’s being used in dentistry. And honestly, it’s happening almost everywhere,” Stern said on the latest episode of The New York Time’s “Hard Fork” podcast discussing her book.

When Stern visited a dentist on her own time, she realized the office used a system called Pearl AI, which promises on its website to catch “37 percent more disease and deliver 24 percent more care to patients in need.”

The tool showed she had a lot of plaque build-up, and the dentist used its finding to give an assessment that was ominous for both her health and wallet: Stern would need periodontal treatment, which would take four different sessions and cost thousands of dollars. That it’d be covered by insurance wasn’t guaranteed.

To Stern, this was “weird.”

“I’ve never needed this before,” she said. “My teeth aren’t really bothering me.”

Wisely, she decided to get some outside opinions from multiple other dentists, all of whom disagreed with the AI’s analysis.

... continue reading