Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Whoop vs. Fitbit Air: I've tested both trackers for health and fitness, and this model wins

read original get Fitbit Charge 5 → more articles
Why This Matters

The Fitbit Air offers a more affordable, subscription-free alternative to premium fitness trackers like Whoop, making advanced health monitoring accessible to a broader audience. Its competitive features and longer battery life highlight the growing trend of mainstream, cost-effective health wearables that cater to everyday users. This shift could influence the industry to prioritize user-friendly, budget-conscious devices without compromising essential health tracking capabilities.

Key Takeaways

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.

Fitness bands are making a resurgence, and Google wants in on the party. Recently, I got a chance to review the latest Fitbit Air.

The $100 fitness band takes aim at popular offerings like the Whoop as an inexpensive alternative to premium health trackers (annual subscriptions start at $200, rising to $360). While Whoop caters to a serious athletic audience, the Fitbit Air goes more mainstream, designed for regular users at a more approachable price point (and no subscription required).

Also: I wore Google's Fitbit Air to track my health for a week, and it's a serious Whoop rival for less money

The devices are similar. They ditch the screen for a band form factor and utilize apps as the center of the health-tracking experience. They both track activity, sleep, recovery, and stress, and, of course, they have complex AI assistants (though Google's AI Health Coach is available only with its premium membership tier).

So which should you buy? That depends on how much you're willing to spend and what you want. While I haven't tried the Fitbit Air out yet, I've compared the specs of both devices and considered their product offerings to break down the pros and cons.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

At a glance

... continue reading