Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

New York passes pied-a-terre tax

read original get Smart Financial Planning Book → more articles
Why This Matters

New York City has implemented a pied-a-terre tax targeting luxury second homes valued at over $1 million, aiming to generate $500 million in revenue and address the city's budget shortfall. This tax will significantly impact wealthy property owners, especially as it phases in over two years, and highlights ongoing efforts to reform property valuation practices. The move underscores the city's focus on increasing revenue from high-value real estate to fund public services and infrastructure.

Key Takeaways

The 220 Central Park South building, center, stands in New York, U.S., on Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2019. Just days after buying one of the most expensive residential properties in London, Citadel founder Ken Griffin set a U.S. record with the $238 million penthouse at 220 Central Park South.

New York City's new tax on second homes will more than double property taxes owed by many wealthy luxury apartment owners, according to tax experts.

State lawmakers on Wednesday passed the tax on nonprimary residences in order to help close the city's budget gap. The so-called pied-a-terre tax will be imposed on second homes valued at $1 million or more. It's expected to raise $500 million in revenue.

Details on the tax obtained by CNBC show that the property tax would take effect in two different phases. In the first two years – the tax years 2026-2027 and 2027-2028 – condos and co-ops valued at more than $1 million by the city's Department of Finance will be subject to the tax. Properties worth between $1 million and $3 million will face a 4% annual tax; properties valued at $3 million to $5 million will face a 5.25% tax; and those above $5 million will face a 6.5% tax.

While the tax seems large, experts say the city's antiquated assessment and valuation system dramatically undervalues properties, reducing the burden. City valuations can often be 10% or less of the true market value, they said.