Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Microsoft is threatening legal action for disclosing exploits

read original get Cybersecurity Exploit Detection Kit → more articles
Why This Matters

Microsoft's aggressive stance against public disclosure of zero-day exploits raises concerns about its approach to security transparency and responsible disclosure. The company's actions could hinder security researchers and dissuade them from reporting vulnerabilities, potentially impacting overall cybersecurity. This controversy highlights the complex balance between corporate security policies and the open sharing of security flaws for collective benefit.

Key Takeaways

is the Verge’s weekend editor. He has over 18 years of experience, including 10 years as managing editor at Engadget.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Microsoft is facing criticism for its handling of zero-day exploits. Someone going by the name Nightmare Eclipse has been publicly feuding with the company, posting proof-of-concept exploit code. Some of their posts suggest that they’re a disgruntled former employee. But what caught cyber security researcher Kevin Beaumont’s eye was how Microsoft has responded.

Microsoft suggests it plans to bring a criminal case against Nightmare Eclipse for failing to follow “proper coordination” in disclosing vulnerabilities. They also disabled Nightmare Eclipse’s GitHub, GitLab, and Microsoft Security Response Center accounts disabled. As Beaumont points out, “It’s quite difficult to ‘responsibly’ report future vulnerabilities when you have been banned.”

What troubles Beaumont is that Microsoft has hired people who have done many of the exact same things. They’ve employed people who have publicly posted zero-day exploits, some with criminal hacking convictions on their record. Microsoft has also purchased exploits from brokers.

Beaumont sums it up:

If Microsoft’s tactic is to try to criminalise not following often arbitrary “responsible disclosure” frameworks, good luck defending that in court — because there’s a whole clown car of prior decision making within Microsoft and facts which would emerge in that process.