Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

5 Fitness Trackers That Don't Lock Core Features Behind a Monthly Subscription

read original get Fitbit Inspire 3 → more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights the growing trend of subscription-based models in fitness trackers, which can significantly increase long-term costs for consumers. The introduction of devices like Google's Fitbit Air, which offers core features without mandatory subscriptions, marks a shift towards more transparent and affordable options in the industry. This development benefits consumers by providing more cost-effective choices and encourages manufacturers to reconsider their pricing strategies.

Key Takeaways

Fitness tracker pricing can be, well, a bit misleading. For example, say the $399 Oura Ring 5 seems to be within your budget at first glance. But to make it remotely useful, you'll need to pay an extra $6 per month or $70 per year. Your total cost jumps up to around $550 after only two years. (And if you hang onto it for five years, you're looking at at least $750.)

Oura isn't even the most egregious subscription-based offender in this space. Whoop, the popular screenless fitness tracking band, requires a membership starting at $199 per year. Granted, that includes the device itself, unlike others. But you don't need to be a math whiz to realize how quickly its cost can add up over the long term, too.

That's why Google's recently released Fitbit Air is so interesting. It's basically a Whoop, with a one-time cost of $100. You can use most of its features without an additional subscription. What a concept! Let's take a closer look at the landscape following the Fitbit Air's entry, to see where you can cut through the paywall noise.