Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

The Trump Administration Is at War With Itself Over AI Regulation

read original get AI Regulation Guidebook → more articles
Why This Matters

The internal conflict within the Trump administration over AI regulation highlights the ongoing debate between fostering innovation and ensuring national security. The uncertainty surrounding potential executive orders reflects the broader challenge of establishing effective AI oversight without stifling technological progress or competitiveness. This situation underscores the urgent need for clear, balanced policies that address both security concerns and industry growth in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

Key Takeaways

The Trump administration is navigating internal strife as officials try to figure out whether they can resurrect the executive order about AI regulation that President Donald Trump abruptly nixed last month, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

The conversations in the weeks since have been widely viewed as chaotic, by both key Silicon Valley players and administration officials. Some AI executives have privately told WIRED they are uncertain what a revised executive order might require, or whether one will end up being signed at all.

On May 21, Trump canceled a planned signing ceremony for the order just hours before it was scheduled to take place. He told reporters at the time that it could stifle competition domestically and reduce the advantage the US currently maintains over China in the AI race.

The most contentious section of the nixed executive order was a provision creating a voluntary framework in which AI labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google would give the White House early access to AI models ahead of their public release to evaluate cybersecurity capabilities.

At its core, the push for regulation reflects a recognition inside the White House that AI is fast becoming a national security concern, given the capabilities of Anthropic’s Mythos and OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 models, which excel at finding vulnerabilities in legacy software systems. The effort suggests a change of heart for the administration, which initially eschewed attempts to regulate AI.

The draft executive order also suggested AI labs could submit models up to 90 days before public release, though several AI executives tell WIRED their companies may not be prepared to share models that far ahead of time. Some AI leaders and aides are hopeful the executive order could come back in revised form, with some of its less controversial provisions intact.

Whether the administration can resurrect an AI executive order now largely rests on the ability of top White House officials to corral competing factions, according to aides across multiple agencies involved in the process.

White House chief of staff Susie Wiles has taken charge of a group of top officials pushing for the executive order to be resurrected, which also includes treasury secretary Scott Bessent and national cyber director Sean Cairncross, a former Republican political operative, the aides say.

Bessent has emerged as a notable force in the administration on AI policy. In recent weeks, he has met with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and other AI executives to forge a path forward, the aides say. And he is expected to take a lead role in negotiating cross-border AI regulation with China.

Trump’s influential former AI czar David Sacks stands in opposition to Wiles. Sacks told Trump that the executive order would be too onerous and reportedly successfully implored him to call off the signing hours before it was set to take place. Politico earlier reported the Sacks-Wiles dynamic.

... continue reading