GoKawiilAMD just launched the Ryzen 7 7700X3D, which is a strange entry in AMD’s AM5 lineup given that it’s built on the Zen 4 architecture rather than Zen 5. We asked AMD’s David McAfee, VP and general manager of Ryzen and Radeon, at Computex 2026, why the company went with Zen 4 over a six-core Zen 5 part. After all, we’ve seen the six-core Ryzen 5 7600X3D but not a Zen 5 replacement. McAfee told us that “may be something that we look at doing… later this year.”
“I think as we go through the rest of this year, I mean we're always looking for ways to, you know, create as many options as we can, and that may become… maybe something that we look at doing as a runway product later this year, simply because you know we know the pressures that are there in building systems aren't going away anytime soon,” McAfee told Tom’s Hardware.
A lot of hedging is required here because McAfee didn’t confirm that the Ryzen 5 9600X3D is in development, nor that it will, for sure, come this year. But it’s clearly something AMD has thought about, and the decision not to release a six-core part at this time came down to more than die allocation.
Latest Videos From Watch full video here:
“The 7600X3D, that has been more of a limited run product, where it really isn’t, you know, day-in day-out available from all of our partners,” McAfee said. “From a supply standpoint, I’m not going to say it’s more difficult to make, but one that doesn’t naturally occur as much as an eight-core product. So, we have been a little bit more selective with how we’ve used the six-core products.”
Broadly, however, McAfee says the decision to release the Ryzen 7 7700X3D came down to a preference from gamers for an eight-core chip, despite recognizing that “the difference between eight cores and six cores isn't huge in terms of gaming,” at least across a broad range of titles. Certain games will see a performance loss with six cores as opposed to eight, but they’re few and far between.
We saw that in action in our recent review of the Ryzen 5 7600X3D, in fact. Despite being nearly two years old, the chip holds up surprisingly well in today’s market at its $230 price on Amazon ($200 in-store at Micro Center). In our testing, the Ryzen 5 7600X3D is just 4.5% slower than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D on average, despite sporting a massive cut to TDP, two fewer cores, and less cache.
Given the context of six-core X3D parts more broadly, if AMD decides to introduce the Ryzen 5 9600X3D, it likely won’t be a far-reaching chip like the eight-core parts are. The Ryzen 5 7600X3D remains a Micro Center exclusive chip, though the retailer recently started selling directly on Amazon, opening up availability for enthusiasts that don’t have a physical retail location nearby.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox. Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors
That has vastly lowered the barrier to entry with X3D CPUs, especially as Zen 3 options have dried up in the market. Prior to the Ryzen 5 7600X3D showing up online, you’d have to spend at least $350 (and likely more) to get an X3D CPU. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D pushes that entry point down further at its $330 suggested retail price. However, an eight-core part, assuming a similar price range between $200 and $250, would push that barrier to entry even lower.
... continue reading