GoKawiilSign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!
The New York Times is getting torn apart by readers after its magazine published a “profile” of the AI “actress” Tilly Norwood.
“I Profile Celebrities for a Living. Nothing Prepared Me for Tilly Norwood,” the article headline reads.
The sub-headline builds on this anthropomorphizing framework: “The AI actress on her craft, the future of film and how she definitely does not intend to murder us.”
Tilly Norwood, for those unfamiliar, is the brainchild of former actress Eline Van der Velden, who founded anAI firm calledParticle 6 Productions. The AI creation was unveiled last year to near-universal backlash from audiences, and importantly, actual performers. (Beloved character actor Ralph Ineson had a succinct response: “F*ck off.”)
At this point you may be asking yourself: how does a profile of an AI model even work? It’s a question that the NYT journalist, Taffy Brodesser-Akner, grapples with throughout the nearly 8,000 word piece, digesting the absurdity of the exercise while unpacking some of the tech’s dispiriting implications for the industry.
It’s far from a paean to AI, in other words, and Brodesser-Akner humorously pokes holes in the AI industry’s promises. But many readers were appalled that the NYT was giving such a huge platform to the AI venture in the first place, on top of the insult of framing it as an actual celebrity profile.
“Taffy Brodesser-Akner is a wonderful TV writer… and marched with us during the writers strike. The fact that she wrote this op-ed is just so damn disappointing,” lamented one Redditor. “Yes it’s farcical, yes it’s skewering the whole idea but that doesn’t take away from the fact that she’s giving oxygen to this cruel and demeaning fever dream of the anti-art oligarchy.”
“Taffy is an extraordinary novelist with a very clear eye, I’m surprised she agreed to this. Yes, its written with a satirical, tongue in cheek tone but it’s disappointing that she wasted so much time on an obvious publicity stunt,” another wrote.
The NYT comment section was no less forgiving.
... continue reading