GoKawiilRyan Haines / Android Authority
For the longest time now, Apple’s Siri has been the butt of the smart assistant joke, and even more so when ChatGPT and Gemini started making their mark in our digital lives — answering more than basic questions or helping with more than simple queries. The first rollout of Apple Intelligence, a couple of years ago, was a fiasco, and we had to wait until this year — and a collaboration with Google — to see Siri resurface and pretend to be useful again.
As Android fans, though, we always find it easy to snicker about Apple’s shortcomings, and perhaps even enjoy the company’s stumbles while Gemini gained trick after trick. But this time, I think we should all root for Apple’s latest Siri endeavors to be successful.
Do you want Apple's Siri implementation to get better? 12 votes Yes. 25 % No. 17 % I don't care. 58 %
Competition is good for Google and Android
Joe Maring / Android Authority
For two years now, Google has faced real AI competition only from ChatGPT. While other services — like Claude, Perplexity, or Copilot — exist and have their fans, they don’t come close to the widespread use and availability of both Gemini and ChatGPT. On phones, specifically, where most of us do our daily computing, the two services have become synonymous with AI. What hasn’t been synonymous with AI is Siri.
Apple’s first efforts were laughable, so much so that I’ve had iPhone users ask me about Pixels and Android because they just don’t want to live “behind the times,” as they aptly put it. When I explained how Gemini can help me understand documents I’m checking out, answer questions about YouTube videos I’m watching, check my screen as I scroll through a long page while replying to my queries about what I’m seeing, among other use cases, they were dumbstruck by how bad Siri is in comparison.
But with Apple adopting Google’s model to improve its own AI and Siri’s implementation, things are about to change, and for the better. Competition has stalled in the on-device AI game; most Android makers, including Google, are just adding random features to flex their AI chops, not for the benefit of users.
Who cares if I can use Gemini Nano to make images of a place from Google Maps? That’s not moving the needle in my daily life. And no, I don’t want to recreate memories with my loved ones who weren’t there by adding them through AI. The last time a friend of mine couldn’t join me on a trip, I took a photo of myself holding a printout of his face. It took time, was intentional, and was endearing, which is the whole point of a gesture like this. The point is that Google is stuck doing things with Gemini just because it can, and competition from a company that usually concentrates its efforts on the user experience, like Apple, is more than welcome.
... continue reading