Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

The AI Hate Progression

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights the growing concerns over the unchecked development and deployment of generative AI, emphasizing how industry hype and profit motives have led to ethical issues like data misuse and lack of user consent. It underscores the importance for consumers and the tech industry to critically evaluate AI's impact and advocate for responsible practices.

Key Takeaways

I think I've spoken at length in other places about how I am a very staunch AI hater and everything I hate about how the tech is presented to us today. But I want to take a second to talk about how I became this way, because I wasn't always like this! Oh no, I thought the whole "I fed the Bee Movie script into a bot and had them make a sequel" thing that perpetuated the early era of generative AI was...amusing, but easily ignored at worst.

In fact, if ChatGPT just kinda sat over there and existed, I probably wouldn't have hated it. Hated the people that used it to "well, acksually" people and be annoying? Of course, but that's no real fault of the technology. Technology is a tool, and takes on the will of the people using it and controlling it, and therein lies the problem.

At some point, the entire tech industry saw ChatGPT and fell into a collective psychosis and decided that this, this is the next big thing, and that we must pull out the stops to ensure the prophecy is fulfilled of generative AI/LLMs becoming the next big thing.

I'm sure copyrighted material was already being fed into LLMs at this point (I mean, you also had people willingly feeding it in, like the example I gave above) but once the techbros caught on and wanted to accelerate this, suddenly EVERYTHING public facing was fair game to training their models. They didn't care whether or not you consented to training their AI (that would later be pitched as a replacement for creatives, cool). If you posted a publicly-accessible photo, they took it and absolutely used it for commercial purposes. Again, without so much as asking for your permission.

Things took an even darker turn once the Money People got involved. Investors proclaimed that they were all in on AI (arguably without understanding what it is past it being the trend of the time and believing false promises that it was going to make them Big Money) and that anyone not going all in on AI wouldn't be getting as much (if any) sweet investor dosh. Your company would also be branded as "behind the times" and doomed to fail because you didn't get in when the going was hot. (Hmm, where have I heard this before? Oh yeah. Crypto shitheads screaming "ngmi" at people who rightfully called them on their hubris.)

As you'd expect, this resulted in companies taking the bait hook, line, and sinker, and cramming AI into services and devices that didn't need it. All because investors demanded it, and companies didn't want to be caught with their pants down if these inflated claims of it being the next big thing proved to be true. This is where the hate for me really started, because a lot of these companies forced AI upon you, with no means to opt out. FOMO is a hell of a drug on a corporate scale, ho-ly.

It didn't matter if everything you did with an app or service wouldn't be enhanced by AI. You had some dumb AI bot shackled to you whether you liked it or not. This is not the way it should have been, and this is where my opinion began to turn from neutral to "no, I hate it, make it go away".

When users started complaining about this, once again, consent was thrown entirely out the window. "Just try it, you'll like it." or "This is the future, you better get used to it." Or even worse, "It's here, we can't put the genie back in the bottle, better get with it or get left behind."

... continue reading