Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Controversial MIT Study Investigates What’s Really Worse for the Environment: Gas or Electric Cars

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The MIT study provides strong evidence that electric vehicles generally have a lower environmental impact than traditional gasoline-powered cars, especially as electricity grids become cleaner. This research underscores the importance of decarbonizing energy sources to maximize EV benefits, influencing industry policies and consumer choices toward sustainable transportation. It highlights that, despite regional variations, EVs remain a greener alternative, reinforcing their role in combating climate change.

Key Takeaways

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

Debates have raged for years over whether electric vehicles are really better for the environment than old-school ones with internal combustion engines.

Often taking the form of harried Facebook posts or Twitter polemics, gas defenders argue that the environmental impact of the typical EV — from mining the metals used to make the lithium-ion batteries to charging the thing before a drive — far outweighs the footprint of a gasoline powered vehicle. EV heads, of course, maintain that because they don’t burn fossil fuels, electric cars have a much smaller impact on the environment than the alternative.

Now, a new study out of MIT has wormed its way into the fracas. It might not put internet flame wars to rest, but it does provide compelling evidence that EVs, not gas guzzlers, genuinely are the better choice for the environmentally-conscious car owner.

First flagged by Jalopnik, the MIT paper takes a look at the overall emissions generated by various types of vehicles, comparing the footprint of internal combustion engines (ICEVs) to plug-in hybrid (PHEVs) and battery vehicles (BEVs). While the researchers found that mileage varies wildly based on the conditions a vehicle operates under, in most locations, BEVs save “40 to 60 percent of emissions compared to ICEVs.”

“The electricity mix is the most important contributor to these regional variations, leading to more uniform and greater emissions reductions if the electricity supply decarbonizes,” the study’s authors write. “Regional driving patterns mean that PHEVs achieve 80 percent to 90 percent of the emissions savings of BEVs in urban areas and 60 percent in rural areas, assuming regular charging.”

Translation: whether you power your EV with coal-fired electricity or electricity from a renewable source does make a difference, but either case is better for the Earth than driving a gas-powered car.

This latest bit of research adds to years of evidence showing EVs leave a lighter impression on the planet. So if you’re still drawn to the growl of a combustion engine, own it — just don’t try to hide behind some false concern for the environment.

More on EVs: You’ll Gasp When You Hear How Many Chinese EVs You Can Buy For the Price of a Single US Car