Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Spying on kids to save kids from spying is stupid

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights the flawed approach of using invasive age verification measures to protect children online, which ultimately leads to increased surveillance and privacy violations rather than genuine safety. It underscores the importance of developing privacy-respecting solutions that truly safeguard kids without compromising their digital rights. For consumers and the tech industry, it emphasizes the need to critically evaluate safety measures that may do more harm than good.

Key Takeaways

Today's links

Spying on kids to save kids from spying is very, very stupid (permalink)

The literature on harms to kids from online platforms is complex and nuanced, rife with people citing small, ambiguous studies as iron-clad evidence that kids are being destroyed by the internet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ype6c6DdHQY

It's a weird coalition of anti-Big Tech campaigners (who are rightly angry at the platforms' callous disregard for user welfare) and Heritage Foundation-backed culture warriors (who think that if their kids aren't exposed to LGBTQ content they won't come out as queer). While there's plenty these groups disagree about, they share one consensus: there should be a "minimum age" for certain kinds of internet use.

The problem is, there's no such thing as "age verification" for the internet. What we call "age verification" is actually mass surveillance, so invasive and pervasive that it makes the ad-tech industry's commercial surveillance look like some kind of cypherpunk darknet pirate utopia:

... continue reading