GoKawiilAre smart rings dying? They were all the rage just a few months ago, with Samsung, Oura, and other brands offering up their shiny new health-tracking jewelry. But, anecdotally, I’ve noticed that this wearable genre is slowly falling out of vogue. We expected several brands to join this group in the coming months and years, potentially including Apple and Google, but the latter has resorted to something entirely different in the meantime.
The Fitbit Air is a screenless band that trades the wearer’s finger for their wrist; it’s certainly not a smart ring. But this begs the question: are consumers happy with this device, or would they prefer a Google smart ring as well?
Well, we asked this in a recent poll, and the results genuinely surprised me.
There’s enough room for a Google smart ring and the Fitbit Air
Andy Walker / Android Authority
First off, it’s worth noting just how many respondents don’t care about screenless trackers in any form. 10.4% of the vote would much rather have a wearable with a screen than a smart ring or an Air-like strap.
However, for those who prefer foregoing screens, the design preference is clear. More than half of respondents (54%) believe that the Fitbit Air’s design is perfect and would pick it over a Google smart ring.
Google's gamble on launching a screenless tracker over a smart ring is paying off.
I completely understand this stance. For decades, I’ve wanted Fitbit to return to its roots with a screenless tracker, and the Air has largely met that desire. Yes, it lacks a few features I’d love in a completely discreet tracker, but its form is a benefit. It’s innocuous, long-lasting, and just silently keeps tracking stats as I go about my day.
Smart rings aren’t as versatile and are more ostentatious. From a practical standpoint, I couldn’t imagine completing daily chores while wearing it. And yes, I could take it off, but that defeats the purpose. As someone who generally doesn’t wear rings, a Google smart ring just doesn’t appeal to me.
... continue reading