Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

I tested two of the best location-sharing apps for a month - this one was most accurate

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights the importance of privacy and consent in the rapidly growing market of location-sharing apps. As these apps become more integrated into safety and family management, understanding their accuracy and privacy implications is crucial for consumers and the tech industry alike. The emergence of privacy-first options like HeyPolo signals a shift towards more ethical and user-controlled location sharing solutions.

Key Takeaways

Charlie Osborne/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.

Most of us now have a smartphone, and in the interest of safety, some parents are providing their children with devices at a young age.

Location-sharing apps have risen in popularity as a way to track the location of family and friends, pinpoint where your loved ones are on a map, and receive alerts when specific destinations are reached. They may also provide features such as SOS alerts, emergency calls, and driver behavior tracking.

However, these apps can also raise privacy concerns. They may have processes running quietly in the background; they may need persistent GPS access, and some apps, while masked as parental control software, could be used in domestic abuse and for coercive control.

Also: How to share your location on Android: 5 quick and easy ways - including by text

The question is: should location-sharing apps be based on consent? This is the idea behind HeyPolo, a new Surfshark-owned location-sharing app that aims to distinguish itself in this space as a "privacy-first" alternative to others on the market.

Let's explore HeyPolo's claims and whether this new location-sharing app can compete with Life360's established technologies and user base.

You should buy HeyPolo if...

... continue reading