GoKawiilCredit: Monty Rakusen/Getty
In April, Nature published advice from doctoral candidates and PhD holders who had managed the unthinkable: pursuing their PhD nine-to-five, or thereabouts.
In response to a follow up poll in the Nature Briefing newsletter, 20% of 6,046 past and present doctoral students said that they spent up to 40 hours per week on their PhDs. But the vast majority — 78% — spent more than that, with some saying their PhDs required at least 80 hours a week (see ‘Clocking in’).
Readers were asked to reflect on the concept of a nine-to-five PhD. Here’s what they had to say.
Creativity doesn’t happen nine-to-five
“The viability of a nine-to-five PhD depends on the research topic. If it’s experimental, no way. If it’s theoretical, then maybe. But my creativity doesn’t turn on at 9 a.m. and turn off at 5 p.m. Even now, long after graduation, I think about work even in bed.” — James Cole, US government expert on optical and photonic approaches to quantum computing. Graduated in particle physics at the University of Maryland, College Park, in 1987
The PhD workload is omnipresent
“From a well-being perspective, the pressure associated with finishing a PhD, having already secured a job, means that it is nearly impossible to not feel crushing guilt when not working. So, the answer for me is that doing a PhD today means omnipresent work.” — Andre Comandon, data manager at the Office of Racial Equity for the State of Vermont. Graduated in urban and regional planning from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 2020.
Does your supervisor think that you’re putting in the effort?
“The main question is, does your supervisor think a PhD can be done in 40 hours per week? Because if not, then you can be as efficient and quick as you want and get everything done, and it will still not be seen as enough.” — Jens Niemann, postdoc at the Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo) in Dortmund, Germany. Graduated in immunology from IfADo this year.
... continue reading