Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Biohackers Attempted Neurosurgery to Control a Lobster’s Nervous System and Give the Controls to OpenClaw, and How It Ended Will Tell You a Lot About the Ethics and Competence of AI Bros These Days

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This controversial experiment highlights the ethical and technical challenges of biohacking and AI integration with living organisms, raising concerns about the boundaries of scientific experimentation and the competence of amateur tech entrepreneurs. It underscores the importance of responsible innovation in the rapidly evolving fields of bioengineering and artificial intelligence, especially as new players push the limits without sufficient expertise or ethical oversight.

Key Takeaways

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

David Foster Wallace once asked readers to “consider the lobster,” in his famous essay about the ethics of boiling the creatures alive.

But new tech brings new horrors, and perhaps Wallace, if he were alive today, would instead be writing about biohacking lobster brains so they can be taken over by an AI agent. Because that’s exactly what a group of young tech founders in San Francisco have attempted to do, according to a riveting side plot in a new feature from The Atlantic about “hacker houses” in the Bay Area. And what happened tells you everything you need to know about the ethics — and actual ability, perhaps — of the people trying to climb their way to the top of this multibillion dollar industry.

Our two would-be Doctor Lobstersteins are 32-year-old Elliot Roth and 19-year-old William Joy. The duo live in one of the many so-called hacker houses that are popping up across the city: college dorm-esque refuges where young tech entrepreneurs bunk together and bounce wild ideas off each other. Theirs is called Biopunk House. It’s home to 20 aspiring tech overlords, and it’s part of a broader network called the Residency, which OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is an adviser on.

The duo’s plan was to use a kit designed for remote-controling a cockroach and implanting it in the lobsters. From there, after demonstrating that they could use to it direct the lobster to do basic stuff like pinch its claws, they’d hook up the now cyborg crustacean to OpenClaw, the wildly popular open source AI agent that has a lobster as its logo. (Yes, this toying with a living being’s biology is also a little joke.)

But wait, aren’t lobster brains and roach brains way different from each other? And wouldn’t this require some serious neurosurgical skills? Don’t worry about it. If the rise of “vibe-coding” has taught us anything about tech bros, it’s that they don’t treat the question of personal ability seriously. If the belief in the technology is there, it’ll all somehow work out.

“I’m pretty sure it’s going to be the first real instance of a complex AI agent interfacing with a biological organism,” Joy rhapsodized to The Atlantic reporter during the planning stages of the experiment.

Don’t get the wrong idea, the pair insisted. Roth and Joy said they were deeply concerned about the lobsters’ welfare, which is why they considered administering them with some kind of anesthetic.

“We are going to give a lot of thought to, ‘How can we ensure that they don’t suffer?'” Joy told the magazine, noting that the animals were “already destined for the dinner table.” (They would eat the lobsters afterwards, they promised, to honor their contributions to bro science.)

Shockingly, their ambitions hit a brutal reality check — for the lobsters mostly, since the humans involved here made out pretty okay. When the reporter checked in on the lobster experiment weeks later, he saw that the tank where the lobsters had been housed “was conspicuously empty of any life or, for that matter, liquid.”

... continue reading