GoKawiilOpinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways Debt itself is neither good nor bad. It amplifies the quality of the decisions behind it, accelerating growth when tied to assets with predictable cash flow and accelerating collapse when tied to speculative bets.
Robert Kiyosaki and Dave Ramsey hold nearly opposite views on debt. Ramsey’s caution toward debt is rooted in risk management, while Kiyosaki advocates for using debt to acquire cash-flowing assets.
But the debate isn’t really about debt. It’s about judgment. The right approach depends on your ability to assess risk, stay disciplined when markets are booming and understand the downside if assumptions prove wrong.
For decades, I have studied the writings of successful investors and entrepreneurs. One lesson becomes increasingly clear with time: Wisdom often comes from observing the hard-earned experiences of others before you experience them yourself.
Two men whose work I respect greatly are Robert Kiyosaki and Dave Ramsey. Both have built large audiences. Both openly discuss failure, setbacks, risk and financial discipline. Yet on one topic, they hold nearly opposite views: debt.
That fascinated me.
How could two intelligent and experienced men arrive at such different conclusions? Is one right and the other wrong? Probably not. The more interesting question is this: Under what conditions is each one right?
In simple terms, debt provides leverage. It allows a person or business to control more assets with the expectation of producing a larger outcome. Used wisely, it can accelerate growth. Used poorly, it can accelerate collapse.
When debt works — and when it doesn’t
... continue reading