Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

read original more articles

Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more

Meta Platforms could face an unprecedented $1.4 trillion in penalties after four states accused the tech giant of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram to addict young users while misleading the public about the platforms' safety.

The eye-watering figure was disclosed by Meta itself in a recent court filing responding to attorneys general's proposed penalty calculations. The total is close to the company's roughly $1.5 trillion market value.

The disclosure comes ahead of a pivotal trial beginning in August in Oakland, California. California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey allege Meta violated state consumer protection laws by creating addictive products for children and teens.

open image in gallery Meta denies the allegations, calling the proposed penalty "unsupported by the evidence” ( Reuters )

Meta denies the allegations, calling the proposed penalty "unsupported by the evidence."

"A sanction of that size has no analog in the history of consumer protection enforcement," the company said in its court filing.

Although the states' filings remain under seal, hearings in June revealed they calculated the potential penalties by multiplying the number of alleged violations by fines allowed under state law. The alleged violations are based on the estimated number of children and teenagers affected.

open image in gallery The August trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will also consider claims brought by 29 states accusing Meta of violating the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act ( Reuters )

The August trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will also consider claims brought by 29 states accusing Meta of violating the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting children's data without proper parental consent.

... continue reading