GoKawiilCritics fear the reforms could weaken government transparency by curbing civil society's access to official information and limiting requests from foreigners.
Shortly before the German parliament's summer recess, lawmakers approved a whole series of reforms. "These reforms are meant to get Germany back on track," said Chancellor Friedrich Merz optimistically.
Toward the bottom of the 34-point list of reforms is something that has begun to cause great controversy: the ruling coalition of conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/ Christian Social Union (CSU) and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) wants to significantly alter the Freedom of Information Act (IFG) , which has been in effect since 2006. Critics say, the plan is to abolish it altogether.
The IFG grants every individual the right to access official information held by federal agencies. This is the law that many organizations, including environmental groups, consumer protection organizations and, not least, journalists, cite to demand that government agencies provide them with data and substantive material quickly and free of charge.
Exceptions apply only to security-related information, such as that held by intelligence agencies, which is, understandably, subject to special protection.
As cyberattacks threaten Germany, can Berlin keep data safe? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The IFG is crucial for journalists and NGOs
However, in the opinion of CDU and CSU, all government information must be treated with exceptional confidentiality in an era of global cyberwarfare and hacker attacks. The government has long intended to significantly amend the regulations.
Now, the 34-point reform paper states that there is a particular need to protect government data during "times of highly complex threats, both domestic and foreign."
According to the government's plan, this could effectively mean that only "natural persons" — not associations or organizations — would have the right to submit requests to government agencies. Currently, requests submitted to, for example, federal ministries are answered either free of charge or for a small fee; now, fees could rise significantly. And the names of employees in government agencies and ministries, among others, could be redacted in the future to protect them "from hostility and threats."
... continue reading