GoKawiilI'm a huge movie fan. I'd even call myself a cinephile. The films I enjoy most are the ones that leave me thinking afterwards. What I don't want to think about beforehand is where I can actually watch them. These days, movies are spread across what feels like a hundred different streaming services. I still don't understand why there isn't a better solution for this. Or maybe I just don't want to accept that this is the only option. Either way, I wanted to figure out how we ended up here, so I did some research.
The original promise of streaming was simple. Everything would be available whenever you wanted it. You could sit down in the evening and binge an entire season without waiting a week for the next episode.
Well... weekly releases seem to be making a comeback. I've forgotten more than one show simply because I had to wait a week for the next episode. But overall, streaming still changed the way we watch movies and TV.
I still remember recording TV shows because otherwise you'd miss them, or waiting until 8:15 p.m. (the prime time) because that's when the big movie of the week started. Today you just lie down in bed, open an app, and watch whatever you're in the mood for. Broadcast schedules don't matter anymore.
Another huge improvement was the lack of ads. One of the most annoying things about television was the ad breaks every fifteen minutes. Early streaming didn't have that. You paid for a Netflix subscription and that was it.
It was also usually cheaper than cable or pay TV, although I'm honestly not sure that's still true today. And maybe the biggest advantage of all was that one streaming service was enough. Most of the movies and shows people wanted to watch were in the same place, so you never had to think about who owned the rights.
Then everything started to fragment. Over time, it felt like every major studio launched its own service. Then Netflix proved just how profitable streaming subscriptions could be. Instead of licensing their movies to Netflix, studios realized they could keep the content, launch their own platform, and collect the subscription fees themselves. From a business perspective, it made perfect sense. From a viewer's perspective, it was the beginning of the mess. Disney made Disney+, Warner launched (HBO) Max, Paramount created Paramount+, and so on. Each company wants to keep its own movies and shows exclusive to its own platform. It's what convinces people to subscribe. The downside is that movies disappear from other services once the licensing rights move back to their original owners. And it's not just movies and TV. Sports have become just as fragmented. The Champions League is on one platform, Formula 1 on another, the NBA somewhere else. And even if you're lucky enough to subscribe to the right service, the movie you want might be on Hulu in the US, Disney+ in Germany or simply unavailable where you live.
As a student I don't have unlimited money. Three streaming subscriptions at around €8 or €10 each might not sound like much, but they add up quickly. If you want 4k or need more than one device, that's another extra charge.
Subscription growth eventually slowed down, so streaming companies started looking for new ways to increase revenue. That's when ad-supported plans became the norm. The cheaper tiers include ads, while the ad-free versions keep getting more expensive. So you start with the ad-supported plan, eventually get tired of the worse experience, and the premium plan is the only option left.
And sports subscriptions are even worse. If you want to follow everything related to your favorite sport, spending €50 a month isn't unusual. Add regular price increases on top of that, and suddenly streaming isn't the affordable alternative it used to be.
... continue reading