GoKawiilOpinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways AI washing happens when organizations celebrate faster response times, adoption rates and new platforms while the outcomes that actually matter — customer retention, employee experience, better decisions — quietly move in the wrong direction.
Before approving any AI initiative, leaders should be able to answer three questions: Will it improve the customer experience? Will it help employees do more meaningful work? Will it help leaders make better decisions? If the answer to all three isn’t yes, the investment is producing activity, not value.
Every company wants to be seen as an AI leader. That goal has created a bigger problem than many executives realize. I call it AI washing. It’s what happens when organizations spend more time promoting AI than proving its efficacy through measurable business outcomes.
I see it in executive meetings across industries. One leadership team proudly walked me through a long list of AI initiatives inside their company’s customer service operation. Response times improved. Automated routing reduced manual work. Every dashboard suggested the project was a success. Then I asked a simple question: What changed for your customers? At this, the room became quiet.
Customer satisfaction had slipped. Retention was moving in the wrong direction. Employees handled conversations more quickly, yet customers felt they were moving through a system rather than receiving help from people who understood them. The technology worked. The business outcome everyone cared about never improved.
That’s AI washing in action and, boiled down, it’s a leadership issue. The organization invested in AI, but the investment never translated into better customer or business outcomes.
After helping build Amazon Web Services and spending years guiding organizations through digital transformation, I’ve learned that AI creates value only when it improves the experience for the people you serve.
Stop measuring activity — start measuring outcomes
The customer service team I worked with wasn’t failing because the technology was bad. They were measuring the wrong things. Faster response times, lower handle times, and higher adoption rates all looked impressive on a dashboard, yet customer satisfaction and retention continued to decline. That experience taught me an important lesson. You shouldn’t base AI success on how much of it you deploy, but on what changes it precipitates.
... continue reading